Absolute ability/achievement does not explain gender differences in educational tracks, but the role of comparative advantage (i.e., being better in one subject compared to another) might. I studied the influence of having a comparative advantage for educational track choices using longitudinal data collected among 1,352 individuals (age 15-16) in upper secondary education in the Netherlands. I found large gender differences in track choices. Compared to girls, boys are on average 15% more likely to enter the most male-typical track (with a focus on science) and 16% less likely to enter the most female-typical track (with a focus on languages). I additionally found that having a comparative advantage in one field over another is important for which track adolescents choose, but it does not explain why boys and girls choose different track choices at such a young age.
Read the whole paper here (open access and thus available to all!)
Add comment
Comments
Hey there! Seeking unfiltered truth? Join our Telegram channel for exclusive, uncensored footage that's shaking up perspectives. Experience the raw reality impacting us all. Don't miss out on this unfiltered journey!
This is unique content that won't be shown on TV.
Link to Channel: HOT INSIDE UNCENSORED
https://t.me/+PhiArK2oSvU4N2Iy